MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409795079 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-448

Design of Intelligent Control Platform for Electric Power Informatization Based on Intelligent Data Analysis

2025· article· en· W4409795079 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformatizationControl (management)Computer scienceIntelligent controlSystems engineeringControl engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to improve the intelligent processing capability of the server of the electric power information platform, the intelligent control platform of electric power informatization based on intelligent data analysis is designed.Taking the regional electric power headquarters as the base point, deploying the electric power informatization intelligent management and control workbench, connecting the necessary systems for electric power operation through the telecommunication management network (TMN), and completing the platform hardware structure design.Divide the platform monitoring function into four parts: query instruction issuance, feedback data reception, data parsing, and data storage, and monitor power data in real time.Deploy data collection algorithms on the data collection server to collect power data such as power harmonics, effective voltage and current, active and reactive power, and harmonic distortion.And Deep Belief Network (DBN) is used to train the anomaly detection model, which realizes the detection of abnormal behavior of the system.Determine the experimental methods and steps, and test the results: the server of the intelligent control platform for electric power informatization designed in this project passed the pressure test of the number of clicks per second and throughput of 100 and 500 simulated users, and has superior traffic processing capability.Application test of the platform, through the test to achieve the design requirements of the system's various functional modules, in the distribution network line and equipment operation status monitoring, fault precision judgment, fault time statistical analysis and daily repair and other work has achieved certain results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicPower Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207