MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409795099 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-435

Bayesian network-based multimodal large model optimization of speech text and its fault prediction capability in power industry

2025· article· en· W4409795099 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceFault (geology)Bayesian networkPower (physics)Bayesian probabilityArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Speech-text multimodal large model as a key tool in the operation of the power industry, its fault prediction performance directly affects the operational safety of mechanical equipment, this paper designs a detailed scheme for the optimization of its performance.Firstly, the structural design of the unimodal model is discussed, and the audio classifier based on Wav2Vec2 and the text classifier based on BERT are used to pre-train the model.Based on the above foundation, a multimodal model is introduced, with the cross-attention mechanism as the fusion strategy, so that the different modal information in the deep neural network is fused with each other, thus improving the accuracy and robustness of the recognition task.After completing the fault feature extraction task, on the premise of introducing the relevant theory of BNN, the structure of BBN is optimized, and after fusing the HC algorithm, BIC and annealing idea, the fault diagnosis method based on the improved BBN network is constructed by combining the fault feature extraction method in the electric power industry and the optimized BBN method.The effectiveness of the method is verified through simulation experiments.The prediction accuracy of this paper's method for nine categories of fault data is above 90% at a high level, and the prediction accuracy of faults in some categories can reach 100%.The multimodal model fusion strategy proposed in this paper significantly improves the performance of fault feature recognition, in addition, the fault diagnosis method based on the improved BBN reduces the computational volume of the model and improves the fault prediction ability of the model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicPower Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207