Research on Intelligent Generation and Adaptation System of Civic Education Content Based on Machine Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper deeply analyzes the innovative application and intelligent upgrading steps of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) in Civic and Political Education.Based on metadata, we construct an automated generation model of Civics education resources, divide the meta-properties of education knowledge resources, set up a knowledge tracking model DT-BKT to obtain students' mastery of Civics knowledge, adopt personalized recommendation model to realize the high adaptability of education resources based on students' Civics learning, and combine the functions of each model to build a Civics education content intelligent generation and adaptability system.Knowledge tracking experiments show that the AUC and R2 indexes of the DT-BKT model in this paper are better than those of other comparative models, and it can better simulate the response of learners on the dataset.Facing different groups of learners is able to recommend Civics courses that meet the learners' abilities.For active learners and potential learners, the average difficulty of the recommended client layer is higher by 0.08~0.15and 0.06~0.085respectively, while the overall difficulty difference for inactive learners is between -0.01~0.015,and the recommended difficulty is in line with the characteristics of the learner groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".