MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409795114 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-496

Blockchain-based Decision Tree Optimization and Data Encryption Algorithm Design for Unmanned Equipment Environment Sensing System

2025· article· en· W4409795114 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicE-commerce and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncryptionComputer scienceDecision treeTree (set theory)BlockchainOptimization algorithmReal-time computingEmbedded systemComputer engineeringComputer hardwareAlgorithmData miningComputer securityMathematical optimizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the context of rapid research and development of unmanned equipment products, how can we better design an environment sensing system suitable for unmanned equipment combat missions and combat tasks from the perspective of actual combat has become an important research topic.This paper explores the optimization scheme of unmanned equipment environment sensing system based on blockchain technology, proposes PBFT (DTPBFT) consensus algorithm based on C4.5 decision tree optimization, and combines with the full homomorphic encryption algorithm to put forward the shared data encryption scheme of unmanned equipment environment sensing system.The experimental results show that the classification accuracy of C4.5 decision tree is as high as 94.37%, which is better than other classification algorithms, indicating that the use of C4.5 decision tree can effectively improve the accuracy of the classification of the consensus nodes and the security of the PBFT algorithm.In the case of the same number of nodes, the throughput size of the DTPBRT algorithm proposed in this paper is always higher than that of the PBFT algorithm, and the consensus latency is higher than that of the PBFT algorithm only when there are Byzantine nodes inside the system, but the DTPBRT algorithm is able to effectively remove the Byzantine nodes inside the system, which verifies the superiority of this paper's algorithm.Comprehensive encryption and decryption time-consuming and throughput data, this paper's scheme in general can realize high data sharing efficiency and ensure the security of data sharing, which can provide technical support for the data security of unmanned equipment environment sensing system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicE-commerce and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207