MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409795128 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-497

AI-enabled enhancement of emotional regulation and musical expression in the art of music conducting

2025· article· en· W4409795128 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Music Perception
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMusicalMusical expressionExpression (computer science)Emotional expressionPsychologyArtCommunicationAestheticsCognitive psychologyVisual artsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Music conductors rely on the visual impact of gestures and emotions for the interpretation and expression of musical works.In this paper, we utilize spatio-temporal two-stream convolutional neural network and replace the original VGG-16 network with ResNet-34 network with deeper network structure to construct a conductor recognition model for improving music conductor level.The Dropou optimization is applied in the fully connected layer to reduce the overfitting phenomenon, and the network structure is designed to fuse the temporal and spatial networks in advance with the feature maps, in view of the defects that the network structure of dual-stream convolutional neural network is shallow and the temporal and spatial networks do not learn the temporal and spatial information correlation.After the construction is completed, the model is applied in the teaching of a music college.The spatio-temporal information fusion convolutional neural network proposed in this paper is compared with other existing methods, and it is found that the optimized design helps the convolutional neural network to learn better, and better emotion and action effects can be obtained.It has better recognition accuracy on the dataset and obtained the highest accuracy of 74.3% on the CoST dataset.The results of the dimensions of music perception ability of the conductor students in the experimental class are better than the reference class, and the dimensions of pitch and intensity are more than 20% ahead of the control class, which proves that the model in this paper is more powerful to promote the development of music perception of the conductor students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing→Same topicNeuroscience and Music Perception→French-language works237,207→