MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409795704 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-475

Oscillation cessation due to removal of Na+ current restored by external noise stimulation

2025· article· en· W4409795704 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrostatic Discharge in Electronics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise (video)Oscillation (cell signaling)StimulationCurrent (fluid)AcousticsMedicinePhysicsInternal medicineComputer scienceChemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, a complete two-dimensional anatomical model of the rabbit heart was constructed by Zhang et al.The positive effects of external noise stimulation on cardiac pacemaking and conduction have been studied using computer simulations.Our results show that: 1) the slower pacemaking rate or even oscillation cessation, which is induced by the removal of Na i from the sinoatrial node or a decrease in the active sinoatrial node cell population, can be recovered by adding external noise.2) Compared to the effect of Na i removal alone, the combined effect of Na i and cell death had a greater impact on slowing down the pacemaking rate.These phenomena indicate that external stimuli play an important role in controlling the initiation and conduction of sinoatrial node pacemaker activity, and that the aging heart may experience obstruction of sinus node conduction and even sudden cardiac death due to decreased cell membrane Na i or partial myocardial cell death.Our results provide insights into the intrinsic mechanisms underlying electroshock healing in some heart diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicElectrostatic Discharge in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207