MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409795714 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-396

Study on the influencing factors and measurement of high quality development level of tourism industry in Guizhou

2025· article· en· W4409795714 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessTourismQuality (philosophy)MarketingGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the gradual improvement of the resilience and vitality of the tourism market, promoting the highquality development of the tourism industry with the new development concept has become an important fundamental issue for the sustainable growth of the regional green economy.The article measures and analyzes the level of high-quality development of Guizhou's tourism industry from 2012 to 2021 on the basis of constructing an evaluation index system for high-quality development of tourism, using methods such as entropy value method and gray correlation analysis.The results found that: the average value of the development index of Guizhou's tourism high-quality development subsystem is ranked in the order of GD, ED, ID, SD, OD and CD, the level of green development and effective development of Guizhou's tourism industry is higher, while the level of coordinated development of the tourism industry and the level of openness are insufficient; HQD, ID, GD, OD, SD and ED show a fluctuating upward trend, while CD is in a fluctuating downward state, and the tourism high-quality development system of Guizhou has gone through a fluctuating upward trend.Guizhou tourism high-quality development system has experienced three stages of evolution, namely, "stable rise, rapid rise and fluctuating rise", and the level of Guizhou tourism high-quality development and the development level of its various sub-systems have been affected by the New Crown Epidemic to varying degrees, with a greater impact on the level of open development of the tourism industry.GDP, per capita park green space area and tourism high-quality development index correlation is larger, while the total amount of SO2 emission and tourism high-quality development index correlation ranked at the bottom, tourism industry R & D funding is the most important factor affecting the level of high-quality development of Guizhou's tourism industry, and the total amount of SO2 emission has the smallest impact on it.On this basis, countermeasures for the high-quality development of Guizhou's tourism industry are proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it