MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409795724 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-445

The Construction of Wushu Cultural Communication System Driven by Intelligent Technology in the Age of Big Data

2025· article· en· W4409795724 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicE-commerce and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataData scienceComputer scienceEngineeringData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As an important part of the excellent traditional culture of the Chinese nation, Chinese Wushu condenses the wisdom of the Chinese nation, contains the genes of Chinese culture, and has important communication value.Based on the big data Hadoop technology, the article proposes a content recommendation design scheme for all-media communication of wushu cultural communication, and introduces the LFM model and MBGD algorithm to construct an intelligent recommendation model of wushu cultural communication content under the framework.Then, based on Lasswell's 5W model, the fsQCA method was utilized to explore the relevant factors affecting the effect of martial arts cultural communication.When the number of hidden factors of LFM-MBGD intelligent recommendation model is 55, its RMSE is 0.92, and the HR@K value of the model can reach 62.12%.The consistency level of the existence and non-existence states of each conditional variable of the communication effect of wushu culture is less than 0.8, and the overall coverage rate and the coverage rate of each path are higher than 0.85.The wushu culture communication system driven by intelligent technology can start from building an online resource base of wushu culture, broadening the communication paths of wushu culture, sounding the laws and regulations of wushu culture communication, and building the brand of wushu to improve the communication effect of wushu culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicE-commerce and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207