Bibliographic record
Abstract
Critical examinations of Louis Althusser’s conceptualization of “interpellation” have circulated within and beyond philosophical circles since 1971. Amongst the best known are Butler’s modifications on behalf of a burgeoning gender theory and Dolar’s Lacanian criticism. While little existing scholarship has sought to bring these responses to bear on one another beyond marking their evident differences, this essay seeks revival of Althusser’s Freudo-Lacanian influences, drawing psychoanalytic thinking on guilt together with queer theory and Black critical thought so as to discern beloved ideological guilt (a certain white guilt) and resistant (but no less ideological) queer guilt from the singular guiltiness of the Black colonial subject—per David Marriott: “A n’est pas [is not] that pits being a subject against the Other who is black.” In pulling these guilts apart, I question why non-Black guilt is beloved or cared after in its effacement of jouissance, as well as how Blackness both interrupts ideology and subjectivity (as an unassimilable irony) and underlies it (as if bound to a permanent and loveless guilt).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".