MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409798412 · doi:10.1186/s12938-025-01380-x

Complexity of post-concussion syndrome assessment and management: a case for customizing rehabilitation

2025· article· en· W4409798412 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBioMedical Engineering OnLine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaireMedicineRehabilitationPhysical therapyConcussionPost-concussion syndromePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPoison controlInjury preventionEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Post-concussion syndrome is a challenging condition to manage for even the most experienced chronic pain experts. Patients' presentations are heterogeneous with symptoms spanning physical, cognitive and emotional domains. The symptoms reported are often non-specific, making it difficult for health professionals to prescribe effective rehabilitation. The aim of the present study was to examine the effectiveness of a customized rehabilitation program based on subgroup determination following a standardized clinical exam in adults with post-concussion syndrome. METHODS: A total of 16 adults (mean age ± SD, 38.3 ± 12.5 years) with post-concussion syndrome participated in a 6-week rehabilitation program. Participants were recruited from external community concussion clinics around the greater Toronto area, Canada. Participants underwent a comprehensive standardized clinical exam to subgroup the ostensible symptom generators into either autonomic, cervical or vestibulo-ocular. Customized rehabilitation was then prescribed based on their subgroupings. The primary outcome measure was the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ). Secondary outcome measures included the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and exercise tolerance as assessed via the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT). RESULTS: Following 6 weeks of customized rehabilitation, participants on average experienced a significant and clinically meaningful change with respect to the RPQ-3 and RPQ-13 (p < 0.001). We also observed a significant change in all secondary outcome measures including a reduction in PHQ-9 (p < 0.01), NDI (p < 0.001) and exercise tolerance, expressed as heart rate threshold (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The standardized exam was feasible and useful in assisting the clinician in prescribing effective rehabilitation. The 6-week customized rehabilitation program demonstrated significant changes in patient-reported persistent post-concussion symptoms and exercise tolerance. The implementation of a customized program based on a standardized exam performed to subgroup the ostensible symptom generators may be key to successful management in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it