Design and Application of Concrete Curing Blankets with Infused Water Super Absorbent Polymers (SAPs)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research presents a recently developed product for concrete curing using superabsorbent polymer (SAP) infusion.A curing blanket has been developed, consisting of layers of polyethylene (PE), nonwoven geotextile fabric (GT), and embedded sodium polyacrylate (SAP) particles.Each layer is carefully optimized to enhance its performance.Spectrometer tests have revealed the transmittance characteristics of PE sheets, crucial for effective water supply during curing.Advanced imaging techniques and standardized testing protocols have been used to analyse the morphology and water absorption capacity of various SAP variants.Conventional burlap and non-woven geotextile fabrics have been assessed for compatibility and water absorptivity.The results highlight the potential of SAP-infused blankets to improve compressive strength, reduce surface cracks, and enhance visual appeal compared to traditional methods.The optimal combination of specific SAP powder into geotextile fabric (GT-200), laminated with specific PE sheet (S7), shows superior moisture retention and surface finish.This study offers insights into reshaping concrete curing practices, emphasizing water-saving benefits and improved structural integrity in hot climates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".