MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409799849 · doi:10.11159/icgre25.158

Optimizing Reliability Analysis of Unsaturated Slopes through Polynomial Chaos Expansion over the Crude Monte Carlo Simulations

2025· article· en· W4409799849 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdul Waris Kenue, B. Munwar Basha

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Education, India
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodPolynomial chaosCHAOS (operating system)Reliability (semiconductor)Computer sciencePolynomialStatistical physicsApplied mathematicsMathematicsStatisticsPhysicsThermodynamicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research investigates Polynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE)-enhanced Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) for probabilistic slope stability analysis in unsaturated soils, presenting a significant advancement over traditional methods.Slope stability in unsaturated soils is complex due to variable soil properties like matric suction, cohesion, friction angle, and unit weigh, that influence shear strength.The Limit Equilibrium Method (LEM), particularly its grid and radius method, is widely used but computationally intensive, especially for unsaturated slopes where fitting parameters of Soil-Water Characteristic Curve (SWCC) affect stability.This study utilizes UQlab [1], a MATLAB-based uncertainty quantification tool, to develop and implement PCE models [2] as a surrogate model within MCS to efficiently compute the probability of failure in unsaturated slopes.PCE approximates complex nonlinear systems with fewer model evaluations, making it ideal for probabilistic stability analysis with significant variability.By integrating PCE into MCS, a surrogate-based approach is developed that maintains accuracy while reducing computational load in estimating the critical factor of safety for the critical slip surface, compared to Crude MCS, which requires many simulations to achieve reliable results.An unsaturated shear strength model [3,4] is used to incorporate soil suction's effect on failure probability, a critical factor in slope stability.Input parameters such as SWCC fitting parameters, cohesion, friction angle, and unit weight are treated as random variables, offering a comprehensive analysis of slope behavior under unsaturated conditions.To optimize the PCE model, leave-oneout cross-validation (LOO-CV) is used, ensuring suitable polynomial degrees to minimize error and prevent overfitting.This validation method enhances the generalization ability of the PCE model, promoting accurate predictions across different input sets.Results show that the PCE-enhanced MCS approach closely approximates the reliability index found in Crude MCS but with substantially reduced computational cost.This efficiency is particularly advantageous for unsaturated soil slope stability, where capturing the lowest probability of slope failure requires numerous simulations.By reducing the number of LEM evaluations, particularly with the Morgenstern-Price method of slices, the PCE-enhanced approach offers a practical solution for geotechnical engineers to perform cost-effective probabilistic analyses.In summary, this study introduces a practical, efficient framework for slope reliability analysis in unsaturated soils, leveraging PCE-enhanced MCS to provide accurate, reliable results with lower computational demands.This method advances current slope stability practices and opens pathways for probabilistic approaches in geotechnical engineering designs, promoting safer and costeffective infrastructure projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental EngineeringSame topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207