Flexural Investigation of Concrete Beams Reinforced with Welded Wire Reinforcement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research investigates the flexural behaviour of reinforced concrete (RC) beams that are transversely reinforced with cold-formed welded wire reinforcement (WWR) sheets in the shape of a closed steel cage.The experimental program comprises the laboratory testing of twelve 2000 mm long beams with 200 mm x 300 mm cross-section.The beams are tested under four-point load configuration with consideration of different wire diameters (4, 6, and 8 mm), grid openings (25, 50, and 100 mm), and concrete compressive strengths (30 and 35 MPa).The specimens are instrumented with linear variable differential transformers and strain gauges and tested inside a universal test machine.Results of the study showed that WWR reinforced beams have about 2% higher elastic stiffness, 18% surplus bending moment capacity, 19% lower ductility, and 4% extra residual capacity than corresponding conventionally reinforced beams with stirrups having the same transverse steel volumetric ratio.However, the impact of the grid size of the WWR on concrete confinement within the core was found to be minimal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".