MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409800012 · doi:10.11159/icsect25.175

Variation of Applied Moment and Tensile Force in Bridge Deck Slab Overhang Due to Transverse Vehicle Impact to Bridge Barriers

2025· article· en· W4409800012 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kousai Razouk, Khaled Sennah

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlabStructural engineeringBridge (graph theory)Transverse planeMoment (physics)Bridge deckDeckMaterials scienceUltimate tensile strengthEngineeringComposite materialPhysicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the moment and tensile force resulting from transverse vehicle impact loads applied at various points along the barrier length.Using three-dimensional finite-element modeling, the barrier and deck slab overhangs of 30 m and 8 m lengths were analyzed for TL-5, TL-4 (MASH), TL-4 (NCHRP 350), and TL-2 single-slope concrete barriers mounted on a 1.5 m deck overhang.The findings were compared with moment and tensile force values from a previous study that focused on vehicle impacts at the barrier's mid-length and end locations.The results reveal a transitional length between the barrier's mid-length and end locations where the applied moment and tensile force sharply decrease, reaching values similar to those at the mid-length.This transition is not addressed in the equations included in the 2025 edition of the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code.It is recommended that designers account for the variation in applied moment and tensile force at locations other than the mid-length and end for safe design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.774

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental EngineeringSame topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207