MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409801646 · doi:10.1002/cncr.35865

Impact of resistance training on inflammatory biomarkers and associations with treatment outcomes in colon cancer

2025· article· en· W4409801646 on OpenAlexaff
Seohyuk Lee, Chao Ma, Bette J. Caan, Alexandra M. Binder, Justin C. Brown, Catherine Lee, Erin Weltzien, Michelle C. Ross, Charles P. Quesenberry, Kristin L. Campbell, Elizabeth M. Cespedes Feliciano, Adrienne Castillo, Kathryn H. Schmitz, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Cancer InstituteNovo NordiskNestlé Health Science
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineColorectal cancerBody mass indexRandomizationC-reactive proteinLean body massRandomized controlled trialCancerOncologyChemotherapyGastroenterologyInflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Among patients with colon cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy, the impact of resistance training with supplemental dietary protein on inflammatory changes during treatment, whether baseline or changes in inflammatory markers are associated with relative dose intensity (RDI), and the associations of inflammation with body composition were investigated. METHODS: A multicenter randomized clinical trial of 174 patients with colon cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy assigned to a home-based resistance training program or usual care was conducted. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α receptor-II, and growth differentiation factor-15 levels were assessed preintervention and following chemotherapy completion. Baseline body composition was evaluated via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Multivariate analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical factors. RESULTS: Patients randomized to resistance training versus usual care experienced similar changes in all inflammatory markers. Those in the highest versus lowest tertile of baseline hsCRP were more likely to have received RDI >70% (odds ratio, 4.11; 95% CI, 1.29-13.1); however, changes across any of the inflammatory markers were not associated with RDI. Patients in the highest versus lowest tertiles of hsCRP, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α receptor-II were more likely to have higher baseline body mass index, total lean mass, and total fat mass. CONCLUSION: Inflammatory markers in patients with colon cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy were not significantly impacted by randomization to a resistance training program but were associated with baseline body composition measures. Further investigations are needed to better elucidate the potential role of inflammatory markers and body composition in predicting important treatment outcomes. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT03291951.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancerSame topicNutrition and Health in AgingFrench-language works237,207