Dinamika Quarter Life Crisis pada Masa Dewasa Awal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter life crisis merupakan. fase transisi yang dialami oleh individu pada masa dewasa awal yaitu rentan usia 18 hingga 29 tahun, krisis ini ditandai dengan eksplorasi identitas, instabilitas, fokus pada diri sendiri, perasaan in-between, dan berbagai kemungkinan dalam hidup. Tujuan dalam penelitian adalah untuk memahami dinamika quarter life crisis yang dialami individu usia dewasa awal. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan fenomenologi, dengan jenis penelitian kualitatif. Pengambilan data pada penelitian menggunakan Teknik observasi dan wawancara mendalam. Analisis penelitian menggunakan teknik analisis deskriptif dengan uji keabsahan melalui teknik triangulasi. Informan dalam penelitian berjumlah tiga orang dengan karakteristik, dewasa awal usia 20-21 tahun, berjenis kelamin laki-laki atau Perempuan, mahasiswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa informan mengalami dinamika quarter life crisis yang beragam dengan respon yang berbeda. Partisipan mengatasi krisis tersebut dengan berbagai strategi koping, seperti eksplorasi diri melalui aktivitas sosial dan akademik, mencari dukungan sosial dari keluarga dan teman, serta pengelolaan emosi dengan cara menenangkan diri dan fokus pada hal-hal positif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".