Trends and historical patterns of meteorological droughts in New Brunswick, Canada, using PDSI and SEDI indices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Droughts are increasingly recognized as a significant global challenge, with severe impacts observed in Canada's Prairie provinces. While less frequent in Eastern Canada, prolonged precipitation deficits, particularly during summer, can lead to severe drought conditions. This study investigates the causes and consequences of droughts in New Brunswick (NB) by employing two drought indices: the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) and Standardized Evapotranspiration Deficit Index (SEDI)– at ten weather stations across NB from 1971 to 2020. Additionally, the Canadian Gridded Temperature and Precipitation Anomalies (CANGRD) dataset (1979–2014) was utilized to examine spatial and temporal drought variability and its alignment with station-based observations. Statistical analyses, including the Mann–Kendall test and Sen's slope estimator, were applied to assess trends in drought indices on annual and seasonal timescales using both station and gridded data. The results identified the most drought-vulnerable regions in NB and revealed significant spatial and temporal variability in drought severity over the 1971–2020 period. Trend analyses further highlighted the intensification of extreme drought events during specific years. Coastal areas in southern NB were found to be particularly susceptible to severe drought conditions compared to inland regions, consistent with observed declines in both the frequency of rainy days and daily precipitation amounts in these areas. These findings underscore the need for targeted drought mitigation strategies particularly in NB’s coastal zones, to address the region’s increasing vulnerability to extreme drought events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".