MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409820509 · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-08844-4

Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy for pain and function in adults with knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

2025· article· en· W4409820509 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peng Ren, Ziliang Wang, Zihui Liang, Shenglin Xia, Xiangnan Yuan, Fenghua Zhou, Xueyong Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueTrials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTendon Structure and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersShengjing HospitalChina Medical University
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisExtracorporeal shock wave therapyRandomized controlled trialProtocol (science)Physical therapyClinical trialExtracorporealPlaceboExtracorporeal shockwave therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgeryAlternative medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most common degenerative joint disease. It is characterized by pain, stiffness, reduced joint motion, and muscle weakness. It also has the potential for long-term disability. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) is a noninvasive therapeutic modality widely used for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. However, the role of rESWT in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis remains controversial in previous clinical trials. This trial will investigate the efficacy of rESWT in improving the symptoms, function, and bone metabolic status of participants with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: The study is a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Thirty participants with knee osteoarthritis will be randomized to receive either rESWT or sham rESWT on the affected knee once per week for 4 weeks. All participants will undergo professional physiotherapy once a week during the treatment period. The primary outcome is the visual analogue scale score for pain. Secondary outcomes include the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, knee range of motion, the 10-m walk test results, and bone metabolism biochemical indicators. Outcomes will be measured at baseline (T0), 5 weeks post-intervention (T1), and 8 weeks post-intervention (T2). DISCUSSION: This study will investigate the effects of rESWT on pain, physical function, and bone metabolism biochemical indicators in participants with knee osteoarthritis, which is expected to reduce the pain of participants, improve the function of participants, and improve bone metabolism biochemical indicators. The information obtained will enhance our understanding of rESWT for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis and may be used to standardize clinical treatment protocols for knee osteoarthritis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300069997. Registered on 30 March 2023.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.006
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrialsSame topicTendon Structure and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207