MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract CT251: Phase 3 INTerpath-009 study: Individualized neoantigen therapy V940 (mRNA-4157) plus pembrolizumab for resected stage II-IIIB (N2) NSCLC with incomplete pathological response to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy

2025· article· en· W4409822007 on OpenAlexaff
Tina Cascone, Nir Peled, Alona Zer, David D. Chism, Danko Martincic, Laureen S. Ojalvo, Zheng Wang, Steven M. Keller, Jonathan Spicer

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPembrolizumabMedicineOncologyInternal medicineStage (stratigraphy)Neoadjuvant therapyCancerImmunotherapyBiologyBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Patients (pts) with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who do not achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and surgery have a worse prognosis than those who achieve pCR, and escalation of therapy for improved outcomes may be warranted. Pembrolizumab (pembro) is approved in several countries as monotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of pts with NSCLC following neoadjuvant pembro plus platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) and resection. V940 (mRNA-4157) is a novel, mRNA-based, individualized neoantigen therapy that encodes up to 34 neoantigens specific to each pt’s unique tumor mutanome and is encapsulated in a lipid nanoparticle that is administered intramuscularly (IM). Preliminary antitumor activity for V940 as monotherapy and in combination with pembro was shown in the phase 1 KEYNOTE-603 study in solid tumors, including NSCLC, and in KEYNOTE-942 in melanoma. The INTerpath-009 study (NCT06623422) evaluates adjuvant pembro with and without V940 in pts with resected stage II-IIIB (N2) NSCLC that did not achieve pCR after neoadjuvant pembro plus chemo. Methods: This phase 3, multicenter, double-blind study is enrolling pts ≥18 years old with histologically-confirmed stage II-IIIB (N2) squamous (sq) or nonsquamous (nonsq) NSCLC (AJCC v8) with no tumor-activating EGFR and no known ALK alterations. Eligible pts are able to undergo protocol therapy, including surgery, and have ECOG PS 0 or 1. Pts eligible for randomization must have resected (R0 or R1) tumors that did not achieve pCR after ≤4 cycles of neoadjuvant pembro plus chemo, and surgical tumor sample available for biomarker analysis and next-generation sequencing. Pts who received neoadjuvant pembro plus chemo prior to enrollment are eligible provided other eligibility criteria are met. Approximately 680 pts will be randomized 1:1 to V940 1 mg IM or placebo Q3W for 9 doses, both in combination with pembro (400 mg IV Q6W for 7 cycles). Treatment will continue until PD, pt withdrawal, unacceptable toxicity, or an additional malignancy requiring treatment. Randomization will be stratified by histology (sq vs nonsq), PD-L1 expression (TPS <1% vs ≥1%), disease stage (II vs III), and geographic location (North America/Western Europe/Australia vs rest of world). Tumor imaging will occur at baseline and every 12 wk until wk 48, every 24 wk through year 3, and every 48 wk thereafter from randomization until distant recurrence, death, withdrawal of consent, or end of study. The primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS) per investigator assessment. Secondary endpoints include OS, distant metastasis-free survival, DFS after next-line therapy, lung cancer-specific survival, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. The first pt was screened on October 21, 2024, and recruitment is ongoing. Citation Format: Tina Cascone, Nir Peled, Alona Zer, David Chism, Danko Martincic, Laureen S. Ojalvo, Joydeep Banerjee, Zheng Wang, Steven M. Keller, Jonathan D. Spicer. Phase 3 INTerpath-009 study: Individualized neoantigen therapy V940 (mRNA-4157) plus pembrolizumab for resected stage II-IIIB (N2) NSCLC with incomplete pathological response to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT251.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207