MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract CT039: Results of a first-in-human phase 1 trial of anchored IL-12 drug conjugate (ANK-101)

2025· article· en· W4409822192 on OpenAlexaff
Jong Chul Park, Brendan D. Curti, Marcus O. Butler, Gail Iodice, Sailaja Battula, Joseph Elassal, James L. Gulley, J Schlom, Howard L. Kaufman, John M. Kirkwood

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConjugateMedicineDrugPharmacologyComputational biologyBiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Systemic delivery of IL-12 is limited by significant toxicity. To achieve therapeutic doses without toxicity, IL-12 was conjugated to aluminum hydroxide (ANK-101) and a Phase I clinical trial was conducted to determine safety, PK, and biologic activity in patients with advanced solid accessible tumors. Methods: A modified dose-escalation Phase 1 study was conducted (NCT06171750) in patients with accessible, advanced solid tumors progressing following standard therapy. ANK-101 was administered at escalating doses with volume adjusted based on tumor diameter. Adverse events were reported per NCI CTCAE, version 5. Serum was collected at specified cycles for pharmacokinetic (PK), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), serum cytokines, and anti-drug antibody (ADA) titers. Whole blood was obtained for peripheral immune cell analysis by flow cytometry. Serial tumor biopsies were obtained for PD-L1 expression, immune cell characterization by IHC and gene expression was evaluated by Nanostring. Tumor measurements were performed every 12 weeks. Statistical analysis was primarily descriptive with categorical variables summarized with numbers and percentages while continuous variables were calculated as mean, standard deviation, median, and range. P≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: 15 pts were enrolled (median age: 68 years). 60% were female and 60% had baseline ECOG score of 0. Notably, 73.3% of those enrolled had received > 3 lines of prior therapy. Seven patients had melanoma, 4 had squamous cell cancer of the head and neck, 2 had breast cancer, and 1 each had bladder and apocrine adenocarcinoma. No patients experienced drug-limiting toxicity while on study and no patients discontinued study treatment due to an adverse event. There were no ≥ Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events. There were two Grade 1 CRS-related fevers. PK analysis showed a trend towards dose response but demonstrated overall low systemic exposures of ANK-101. ADA were detected in one patient treated after three cycles. Biologic activity was further confirmed by an increase in serum IFN-γ with peak levels ranging 18-496 pg/mL 24 hrs after treatment. ANK-101 induced local expression of PD-L1 and recruitment of CD8+ T cells and increased local gene expression consistent with immune activation. To date, 11 subjects are evaluable for response with a disease control rate of 63.6% and best objective responses include 1 PR, 7 SD, and 3 PD. 6 subjects remain on active treatment. Conclusions: ANK-101 is well tolerated at doses tested, demonstrated biologic activity, and was associated with durable disease control across different tumors in a heavily pretreated population. Further investigation is warranted. Citation Format: Jong Chul Park, Brendan Curti, Marcus O. Butler, Gail Iodice, Sailaja Battula, Joseph Elassal, James L. Gulley, Jeffery Schlom, Howard L. Kaufman, John M. Kirkwood. Results of a first-in-human phase 1 trial of anchored IL-12 drug conjugate (ANK-101) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT039.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207