MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409826200 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2025-1504

The evolution of methane production rates from young to mature thermokarst lakes

2025· preprint· en· W4409826200 on OpenAlexafffund
Yarden Gerera, André Pellerin, Efrat Eliani Russak, Katey Walter Anthony, Nicholas Hasson, Yoav O. Rosenberg, Orit Sivan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIsrael Science FoundationH2020 European Research CouncilJohns Hopkins UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsThermokarstMethaneProduction (economics)Environmental scienceProduction rateEarth scienceEnvironmental chemistryChemistryEcologyGeologyProcess engineeringBiologyEconomicsEngineeringPermafrost

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Thermokarst lakes, formed by permafrost thaw in the Arctic, are hotspots for methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and are expected to double permafrost carbon emissions by the end of the century. While the implications of ongoing permafrost thaw on methane dynamics within these lakes have been modeled, here we provide empirical data on methane production dynamics as lakes evolve from young recently formed lakes to older lakes that have been present for hundreds of years. Sediment cores (up to 4 m long) were collected from the centers and thermokarst margins of a new thermokarst lake [Big Trail Lake (BTL), <70 years] and from an older thermokarst lake [Goldstream Lake (GSL), ~900 years] from the same interior Alaskan watershed. Highest methane production rates were observed in the uppermost sediments near the sediment-water interface at the thermokarst margins of both lakes, with a steep decrease with sediment depth into the talik. BTL exhibited elevated methane production rates, correlated with higher carbon lability for thermal induced reactions measured by Rock Eval analyses, and suggesting its potential use as a proxy for organics susceptibility for methanogenesis. In contrast, GSL displayed lower methane production rates, likely due to a longer period of organic matter degradation and reduced carbon lability. The integrated sediment-column methane production rates were similar (around 7–10 mol m-2 year-1), primarily due to the thinner talik at BTL. Our data support the predictions that formation and expansion of thermokarst lakes over the next centuries will increase methane production in newly thawed Yedoma permafrost sediments, while methane production will decrease as taliks mature and labile organic matter is used up. The positive warming effect of yedoma lake methane emissions may weaken over longer periods as the organics becomes mainly refractory, and the landscape can no longer support significant lake formation and expansion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→