THE STRATEGIC POLICY OF CITY GOVERNMENT IN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING FOR TOURISM IN PALANGKA RAYA CITY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to identify the level of readiness of the 6A components in destinations including: attractions, amenities, accessibility, availability of tourist packages (available packages), tourist activities (activities) and services, as well as public facilities (ancillary services) to produce The Strategic Policy Of City Government In Development Planning For Tourism In Palangka Raya City requires cooperation between the Government and the community, both in the form of developing a tourism-aware community and direct community involvement as investors in the tourism sector. Arrangement and revitalization of areas in the City of Palangka Raya by taking into account the social conditions and cultural character of the community, Arrangement and development of accessibility and public space facilities in the area. Development of creative spaces to gather creative people in the City of Palangka Raya and the policies are stated in the Regional Regulation of Palangka Raya City Number 11 of 2017 concerning the Master Plan for Tourism Development of Palangka Raya City 2017 – 2028.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".