Self-Efficacy dan Quarter Life Crisis Pada Mahasiswa Keperawatan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter life crisis adalah periode transisi kritis yang sering dialami oleh mahasiswa, ditandai oleh kekhawatiran, kegelisahan, dan kurangnya kepercayaan diri. self-efficacy atau efikasi diri merupakan keyakinan individu terhadap kemampuan mereka dalam mengatasi tantangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki hubungan antara self-efficacy dan quarter life crisis pada mahasiswa tingkat IV Program Studi Sarjana Keperawatan. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain kuantitatif-korelasi dengan pendekatan cross-sectional. Sampel penelitian terdiri dari 75 mahasiswa tingkat IV yang dipilih melalui total sampling. Data dikumpukan menggunakan kuesioner tertutup yang terdiri dari General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) dan Quarter Life Crisis Scale (QLCS). Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan uji spearmanrank.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 48.0% responden memiliki tingkat self-efficacy tinggi, sementara 45.3% mengalami quarter life crisis pada tingkat sedang. Analisis spearmanrank mengindikasikan adanya hubungan negatif yang kuat antara self-efficacy dan quarter life crisis (p < 0,000;koefisian korelasi = -0,666). Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya pengembangan self-efficacy dalam membantu mahasiswa mengatasi quarter life crisis. Intervensi berbasis peningkatan self-efficacy seperti program bimbingan konseling, dapat menjadi strategi efektif untuk kesejahteraan psikologis mahasiswa. Quarter life crisis is a critical transition period often experienced by college students, characterized by worry, anxiety, and lack of self-confidence. Self-efficacy is an individual's belief in their ability to overcome challenges. This study aims to investigate the relationship between self-efficacy and quarter life crisis in fourth-year students of the Bachelor of Nursing Study Program. This study used a quantitative-correlation design with a cross-sectional approach. The research sample consisted of 75 fourth-year students selected through total sampling. Data were collected using a closed questionnaire consisting of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) and the Quarter Life Crisis Scale (QLCS). Data analysis was performed using the Spearman Rank test. The results showed that 48.0% of respondents had a high level of self-efficacy, while 45.3% experienced a moderate level of quarter life crisis. Spearman Rank analysis indicated a strong negative relationship between self-efficacy and quarter life crisis (p <0.000; correlation coefficient = -0.666). These findings underscore the importance of developing self-efficacy in helping students cope with quarter-life crisis. Self-efficacy-based interventions, such as counseling programs, can be an effective strategy for students' psychological well-being.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".