MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409837337 · doi:10.1186/s13075-025-03513-y

Comprehensive comparative analysis of infrapatellar fat pad morphologies in a longitudinal knee osteoarthritis exploratory study: new insights into its role as an independent prognostic marker

2025· article· en· W4409837337 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Pierre Pelletier, Patrice Paiement, F. Abram, Marc Dorais, Jean‐Pierre Raynauld, Johanne Martel‐Pelletier

Bibliographic record

VenueArthritis Research & Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsHôpital Notre-DameCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersGlaxoSmithKlineNational Institutes of HealthNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationPfizerU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
KeywordsInfrapatellar fat padOsteoarthritisMedicineRheumatologyInternal medicinePhysical therapyKnee JointOrthopedic surgeryLongitudinal studyPathologySurgeryAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: No established markers can effectively phenotype knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients into subgroups. Infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) morphology data that can forecast disease symptoms, structural changes, and knee replacement (KR) are sparse and conflicting. This 96-month longitudinal exploratory study aimed to identify which IPFP morphological features were the most effective independent prognostic markers against these outcomes. METHODS: This longitudinal study analyzed 1075 target knees (one knee per participant) from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) progression cohort. Structural changes include cartilage, bone marrow lesions (BMLs), and joint effusion volumes assessed using automated and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging systems (MRI). The IPFP global and signal (hyper- and hypo-) intensity volumes and areas were assessed using MRI combined with a newly developed, fully automated neuron-driven technology. Symptoms were evaluated using WOMAC scores. Data on KR was obtained from the OAI database. Data were collected at baseline and 12, 24, 48 and 96 months and analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) or ANCOVA. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were mild to moderate knee OA. Over time, disease symptoms (WOMAC), cartilage volume, IPFP global and hypointense signal volumes, and maximal and hypointense signal areas decreased (all p≤0.001). Joint effusion and hyperintense signal volume and area increased (both p≤0.001). Associations were found between IPFP morphologies at inclusion and changes in cartilage volume (hypointense and hyperintense volumes, 48, 96 months, p≤0.04), BML volume (global volume 48 months, p=0.05; hyperintense area, 12 months, p≤0.04), and effusion volume (hypointense volume 48 months and hyperintense volume 96 months, p≤0.05). At inclusion, smaller IPFP sizes (below median) were associated with cumulative KR at 96 months (global and hypointense volumes, p≤0.04 and maximum area, p=0.05). CONCLUSION: This longitudinal exploratory study, leveraging a fully automated technology, highlights that i) IPFP volume (global and both signals) is superior to area metrics in predicting long-term structural changes in OA, and ii) smaller IPFP volume and area are linked with reduced need for KR. These findings provide new insights into the usefulness of IPFP morphology as a predictive biomarker of knee OA outcomes, offering a new approach to stratifying knee OA patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthritis Research & TherapySame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207