Gen-JEMA: enhanced explainability using generative joint embedding multimodal alignment for monitoring directed energy deposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This work introduces Gen-JEMA, a generative approach based on joint embedding with multimodal alignment (JEMA), to enhance feature extraction in the embedding space and improve the explainability of its predictions. Gen-JEMA addresses these challenges by leveraging multimodal data, including multi-view images and metadata such as process parameters, to learn transferable semantic representations. Gen-JEMA enables more explainable and enriched predictions by learning a decoder from the embedding. This novel co-learning framework, tailored for directed energy deposition (DED), integrates multiple data sources to learn a unified data representation and predict melt pool images from the primary sensor. The proposed approach enables real-time process monitoring using only the primary modality, simplifying hardware requirements and reducing computational overhead. The effectiveness of Gen-JEMA for DED process monitoring was evaluated, focusing on its generalization to downstream tasks such as melt pool geometry prediction and the generation of external melt pool representations using off-axis sensor data. To generate these external representations, autoencoder (AE) and variational autoencoder (VAE) architectures were optimized using Bayesian optimization. The AE outperformed other approaches achieving a 38% improvement in melt pool geometry prediction compared to the baseline and 88% in data generation compared with the VAE. The proposed framework establishes the foundation for integrating multisensor data with metadata through a generative approach, enabling various downstream tasks within the DED domain and achieving a small embedding, allowing efficient process control based on model predictions and embeddings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".