MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409842928 · doi:10.1101/2025.04.24.650499

From Fragmentation to Resolution: High-Fidelity Genome Assembly of <i>Zancudomyces culisetae</i> through Comparative Insights from PacBio, Nanopore, and Illumina Sequencing

2025· preprint· en· W4409842928 on OpenAlexafffund
Yan Wang

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect symbiosis and bacterial influences
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
KeywordsBiologyGenomeSequence assemblyNanopore sequencingHybrid genome assemblyIllumina dye sequencingGenome sizeObligateContigDNA sequencingComparative genomicsWhole genome sequencingGeneticsShotgun sequencingComputational biologyGenomicsGeneTranscriptomeEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Zancudomyces culisetae is an obligate symbiotic fungus inhabiting the digestive tracts of aquatic insect larvae, including black flies, midges, and mosquitoes. With a global distribution and high prevalence in disease-transmitting insects, Z. culisetae serves as a model for studying insect gut fungi. A previous draft genome assembly using Illumina short reads provided insights into its genome composition, such as a low GC ratio and evidence of horizontal gene transfer. However, its fragmented nature has limited deeper exploration of the evolutionary mechanisms shaping these gut symbionts. To address this gap, we generated a wealth of genomic resources for Z. culisetae using multiple sequencing platforms, including Illumina, Oxford Nanopore, PacBio-CLR (Complete Long Reads), and PacBio-HiFi (High Fidelity). This also provides an opportunity to compare these popular sequencing methods to suggest the optimal approach for fungal genome assembly. Our results suggest that PacBio-HiFi produced the most complete assembly, yielding a 27.8 Mb genome size with 26 contigs, representing the highest-quality genome of insect gut fungi to date. Additionally, we generated transcriptomic data to support genome annotation, identifying 8,484 protein-coding genes. Despite the improved genome quality, Z. culisetae lacks approximately 20% of Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologue (BUSCO) commonly found in fungi, reflecting adaptations to its obligate symbiotic lifestyle. This study not only provides valuable genomic resources for insect gut fungal research but also evaluates the strengths and limitations of current genome sequencing and assembly approaches, offering best practices for fungal genome analysis and genetic research. Article Summary Mosquito larvae harbor gut-dwelling fungi that may influence their development and disease transmission. Zancudomyces culisetae is a widespread fungal symbiont of mosquitoes, but its genome remained incomplete. This study explored and compared popular sequencing technologies, including Illumina, Oxford Nanopore, PacBio-CLR, and PacBio-HiFi, to generate a high-quality genome, alongside the first transcriptomic data. PacBio-HiFi produced the most complete assembly (27.8 Mb, 26 contigs) with 8,484 protein-coding genes, though ∼20% of core fungal genes were absent, reflecting symbiotic adaptation. This study establishes a genomic foundation for insect gut-dwelling fungi and evaluates available sequencing and assembly strategies for high-quality fungal genome production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicInsect symbiosis and bacterial influencesFrench-language works237,207