MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Revealing the distribution and efficient enrichment of cobalt in a Cu–Au skarn mineralization system

2025· article· en· W4409844649 on OpenAlexaff
Shitao Zhang, Jianfeng Gao, He Zhang, Xiaowen Huang, Jianping Li, Rucao Li, Hao Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueOre Geology Reviews · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkarnMineralization (soil science)GeologyGeochemistryCobaltMineralogyPaleontologyMetallurgyHydrothermal circulationFluid inclusionsSoil scienceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Cobalt mainly occurs in pyrite, sphalerite and magnetite in the Tonglushan deposit. • High oxygen fugacity and hydrous mantle-derived magma promote cobalt enrichment. • Fluid mixing and cooling reduce oxygen fugacity and lead to cobalt precipitation. Cobalt (Co) has become one of the most indispensable key metals globally, underpinning numerous industries and driving technological breakthroughs, particularly in the field of new energy electric vehicles. Skarn ore deposits are a significant source of cobalt reserves, and in China, cobalt-bearing skarn deposits account for about 28 % of the country’s total cobalt reserves. The Middle–Lower Yangtze River Metallogenic Belt (MLYRB) in eastern China stands as an important Cu–Au–Fe–Co polymetallic ore belt. However, previous research initiatives have focused primarily on cobalt associated with Fe skarn deposits, leaving the exploration of cobalt occurrence and enrichment in Cu–Au skarn deposits within the MLYRB unexplored. The Tonglushan deposit (86.3 Mt @ 1.66 % Cu, 0.94 g/t Au, 39.4 % Fe and 0.012 % Co) is representative Cu–Au polymetallic skarn deposit in the MLYRB, characterized by medium-scale cobalt mineralization. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive investigation into the distribution and enrichment patterns of cobalt at Tonglushan through detailed petrographic observations, SEM, LA–ICP–MS, TEM, and in situ S isotope analysis. The results show that cobalt primarily exists in pyrite (Pyb1 avg. 3827 ppm; Pyb2 avg. 2067 ppm), sphalerite (avg. 653 ppm), and magnetite (avg. 324 ppm) within the skarn mineralization centre at Tonglushan. Elemental correlation analysis and TEM investigations reveal that Co and Ni predominantly substitute for Fe 2+ in magnetite and pyrite, while Co and Fe primarily replace Zn 2+ in sphalerite through isomorphic substitution. Moreover, in the early alteration stages, the high temperature and high salinity of hydrothermal fluids facilitate the efficient migration of cobalt in the form of CoCl 4 2- . In the subsequent ore-forming stage, fluid mixing and cooling lead to a decrease in oxygen fugacity, which is the main factor responsible for cobalt precipitation. Our finding further highlights that the sulfide-rich magnetite ores in the Cu-Au and Fe skarn mineralization centre may hold significant potential for exploration and exploitation of cobalt resources within the MLYRB in eastern China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOre Geology ReviewsSame topicMetal Extraction and BioleachingFrench-language works237,207