Features of the organization and holding of the European Sports Olympiads of the Union of Ukrainian Youth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article analyzes the activities of the Union of Ukrainian Youth. It is established that in 2025 the Union of Ukrainian Youth will celebrate 100 years of existence. During this time, various spheres of society have been relevant areas of activity of the Union of Ukrainian Youth both in Ukraine and abroad. A special role in the daily work of activists of the Union of Ukrainian Youth is occupied by physical education, sports and Olympic traditions. The Union of Ukrainian Youth in the diaspora has developed lively sports activities in France, Germany, Belgium, Great Britain, the USA, Canada, Australia and other countries. Sports centers, clubs, teams in various sports were created: football, volleyball, track and field athletics, hockey, etc. It is found that in Europe the activities of the Union of Ukrainian Youth were holistic, organized and large-scale. A special area of work of the Union of Ukrainian Youth was sports and Olympic competitions. It was revealed that since 1974, the Ukrainian Youth Union has been holding the European Sports Olympiads. They were held in Germany, France, and Great Britain. Several facts testify to the popularity of these competitions: the number of participants, an interesting program of competitions, annual holding, attention from the media, support from various Ukrainian diaspora organizations, unity with Olympic traditions, etc. The features of the preparation, organization, and holding of the European Sports Olympiads of the Ukrainian Youth Union as a phenomenon of the unity of Ukrainians from all over the world in the struggle for the freedom of enslaved Ukraine are analyzed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".