Metabolic dysfunction-associated steaotic liver disease self-management among the Hispanic/Latino population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Hispanic/Latino populations in the U.S. have the highest prevalence of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steaotic Liver Disease (MASLD), and diet and exercise management are crucial for controlling the disease. While quantitative research on general diet and physical activity within this population exists, studies specifically addressing the quantitative analysis of self-management behaviors in Hispanic/Latino individuals with MASLD are notably scarce. This gap underscores the need for our focused investigation into these specific behaviors under the framework of self-management. Objectives Our study aims to investigate how various factors such as age, gender, socioeconomic status, and cultural influences are associated with diet and exercise self-management behaviors in Hispanic/Latino individuals with MASLD. We specifically explore the impact of these demographic and cultural factors as independent variables on the dependent variables of diet and exercise self-management behaviors. Methods This study involved 94 participants who were recruited from the Fresno Clinical Research Center to participate in a cross-sectional analysis designed to explore diet and exercise self-management behaviors among Hispanic/Latino people with MASLD. Data were collected from January 2023 to February 2023 using a 54-item Qualtrics survey. Results The average age of the participants was 53 years. Among the participants, 68.1% self- identified as female, and 80.9% had an annual income of at least $35,000. Age b = 0.074, p ≤ 0.001, gender b = 1.242, p ≤ 0.05, and financial stress b = 1.887 p ≤ 0.01 were predictors for poor exercise self-management behaviors. Disease-related knowledge b = −2.264 p ≤ 0.001, and familism b = −0.344 p ≤ 0.05 were predictors for healthy exercise self-management behaviors. There were no significant predictors for diet self-management behaviors among the variables observed in this study. Conclusion Age, gender, and financial stress predicted poor exercise self-management behaviors, while disease-related knowledge and familism predicted healthy exercise self-management behaviors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".