MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409875899 · doi:10.1016/j.petsci.2025.04.028

Deep learning-assisted optimization for enhanced oil recovery and CO2 sequestration considering gas channeling constraints

2025· article· en· W4409875899 on OpenAlexaff
Xinyu Zhuang, Wendong Wang, Yuliang Su, Zhenxue Dai, Bicheng Yan

Bibliographic record

VenuePetroleum Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCarbon sequestrationPetroleum engineeringEnhanced oil recoveryFossil fuelEngineeringBiochemical engineeringEnvironmental scienceChemistryWaste managementOrganic chemistryCarbon dioxide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO 2 -EOR) technology guarantees substantial underground CO 2 sequestration while simultaneously boosting the production capacity of subsurface hydrocarbons (oil and gas). However, unreasonable CO 2 -EOR strategies, encompassing well placement and well control parameters, will lead to premature gas channeling in production wells, resulting in large amounts of CO 2 escape without any beneficial effect. Due to the lack of prediction and optimization tools that integrate complex geological and engineering information for the widely used CO 2 -EOR technology in promising industries, it is imperative to conduct thorough process simulations and optimization evaluations of CO 2 -EOR technology. In this paper, a novel optimization workflow that couples the AST-GraphTrans-based proxy model (Attention-based Spatio-temporal Graph Transformer) and multi-objective optimization algorithm MOPSO (Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization) is established to optimize CO 2 -EOR strategies. The workflow consists of two outstanding components. The AST-GraphTrans-based proxy model is utilized to forecast the dynamics of CO 2 flooding and sequestration, which includes cumulative oil production, CO 2 sequestration volume, and CO 2 plume front. And the MOPSO algorithm is employed for achieving maximum oil production and maximum sequestration volume by coordinating well placement and well control parameters with the containment of gas channeling. By the collaborative coordination of the two aforementioned components, the AST-GraphTrans proxy-assisted optimization workflow overcomes the limitations of rapid optimization in CO 2 -EOR technology, which cannot consider high-dimensional spatio-temporal information. The effectiveness of the proposed workflow is validated on a 2D synthetic model and a 3D field-scale reservoir model. The proposed workflow yields optimizations that lead to a significant increase in cumulative oil production by 87% and 49%, and CO 2 sequestration volume enhancement by 78% and 50% across various reservoirs. These findings underscore the superior stability and generalization capabilities of the AST-GraphTrans proxy-assisted framework. The contribution of this study is to provide a more efficient prediction and optimization tool that maximizes CO 2 sequestration and oil recovery while mitigating CO 2 gas channeling, thereby ensuring cleaner oil production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePetroleum ScienceSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207