MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409879448 · doi:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001255

Estimation of unconfirmed COVID-19 cases from a cross-sectional survey of >10 000 households and a symptom-based machine learning model in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan

2025· article· en· W4409879448 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel S. Farrar, Lisa G. Pell, Yasin Muhammad, Sher Hafiz Khan, Lauren Erdman, Diego G. Bassani, Zachary Tanner, Imran Ahmed, Muhammad Karim, Falak Madhani, Shariq Paracha, Masood Ali Khan, Sajid Soofi, Monica Taljaard, Rachel F. Spitzer, Sarah M Abu Fadaleh, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Shaun K. Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenPublic Health OntarioSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoUniversity of OttawaVector Institute
FundersHospital for Sick ChildrenGrand Challenges CanadaAga Khan Foundation CanadaAga Khan FoundationSpinal Muscular Atrophy Foundation
KeywordsMedicinePoisson regressionCross-sectional studyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PneumoniaEpidemiologySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)DemographyEnvironmental healthInternal medicinePopulationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Robust estimates of COVID-19 prevalence in settings with limited capacity for SARS-CoV-2 molecular and serologic testing are scarce. We aimed to describe the epidemiology of confirmed and probable COVID-19 in Gilgit-Baltistan, and to develop a symptom-based predictive model to identify infected but undiagnosed individuals with COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in 10 257 randomly selected households in Gilgit-Baltistan from June to August 2021. Data regarding SARS-CoV-2 testing, healthcare worker (HCW) diagnoses, symptoms and outcomes since March 2020 were self-reported by households. 'Confirmed/probable' infection was defined as a positive test, HCW COVID-19 diagnosis or HCW pneumonia diagnosis with COVID-19-positive contact. Robust Poisson regression was conducted to assess differences in symptoms, outcomes and SARS-CoV-2 testing rates. We developed a symptom-based machine learning model to differentiate confirmed/probable infections from those with negative tests. We applied this model to untested respondents to estimate the total prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: Data were collected for 77 924 people. Overall, 314 (0.5%) had confirmed/probable infections, 3263 (4.4%) had negative tests and 74 347 (95.1%) were untested. Children were tested less often than adults (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) 0.08, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.12 for ages 1-4 years vs 30-39 years), while males were tested more often than females (aPR 1.51, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.63). In the predictive model, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.93). We estimate there were 8-17 total SARS-CoV-2 infections for each positive test (8-17:1). The ratio of estimated to confirmed cases was higher for ages 1-4 years (211-480:1), 5-9 years (80-185:1) and for females (13-25:1). Conclusions: From March 2020 to August 2021, the majority of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Gilgit-Baltistan went unconfirmed, particularly among women and children. Predictive models which incorporate self-reported symptoms may improve understanding of the burden of disease in settings lacking diagnostic capacity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.058
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.058
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.394
GPT teacher head0.520
Teacher spread0.126 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Public HealthSame topicCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesFrench-language works237,207