MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409879535 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.112539

Functional thalamocortical innervation of VIP- and SST-expressing GABAergic interneurons in mouse barrel cortex

2025· article· en· W4409879535 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Feyerabend, Mirko Witte, Martin Möck, Jochen F. Staiger

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsGABAergicBarrel cortexNeuroscienceMolecular neuroscienceCortex (anatomy)InterneuronBiologyChemistryAnatomySomatosensory systemReceptorInhibitory postsynaptic potentialBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In sensory cortices, conscious perception of stimuli involves a complex interplay of excitatory and inhibitory circuits. The subcortical source of sensory information is the thalamus, which in the whisker system houses (1) the "lemniscal" ventral posteromedial nucleus (VPM) and (2) the "paralemniscal" medial part of the posterior nucleus (POm). How much these two complementary inputs can drive feedforward inhibition in cortical layers by synapsing on GABAergic neurons is still incompletely understood. Here, we used optogenetics to study the incidence of VPM and POm projections to vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP)- and somatostatin (SST)-expressing interneurons in barrel cortex. By using sensitive stimulation and recording methods, we show that VIP and SST neurons receive an extensive input, largely independent of laminar location or various cellular properties. Thus, thalamus-mediated feedforward inhibition is implemented in the circuit motifs of probably all VIP and SST interneurons, which they might differentially use, dependent on specific whisking behaviors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207