MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409881704 · doi:10.1080/10437797.2025.2484484

Teaching Note—Proposing a School Social Work Practice Course for Master of Social Work Students: Call for a Canadian Perspective

2025· article· en· W4409881704 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gwendolyn Fearing-Afflick, Stefani Burosch, Tracey Grose

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Social Work Education · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Work Education and Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial workPerspective (graphical)Course (navigation)PedagogySociologyWork (physics)PsychologyMedical educationMedicinePolitical scienceComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of a school social worker in Ontario is multifaceted and evolving. School social work (SSW) practice includes, but is not limited to, advocacy, attendance support, well-being education, equity work, system capacity building, and mental health intervention. Increasingly, SSW practice in Ontario receives implementation support from School Mental Health Ontario, which promotes the delivery of identity-affirming, culturally responsive, and evidenced-informed mental health services within a multitiered system of support (MTSS). This teaching note proposes that, now more than ever, SSW practice is a specialized area of social work that deserves a special topic course to prepare students for work in this unique practice context. Furthermore, this teaching note outlines suggested content themes for an introductory course that is aligned with the MTSS model that encourages a range of service delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.836

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.409 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Social Work EducationSame topicSocial Work Education and PracticeFrench-language works237,207