MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409883195 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3564927

Enhanced L-MEB Model for Soil Moisture Retrieval Over Soybean Fields During the Growing Season

2025· article· en· W4409883195 on OpenAlexaff
Minfeng Xing, Jiali Shang, Xin Zhou, Jinfei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsWater contentEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingGrowing seasonMoistureSoil scienceMeteorologyAgronomyGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soybean, a pivotal global source of oil and protein, exhibits heightened sensitivity to soil moisture conditions throughout its growth cycle. Accurate monitoring of soil moisture (SM) in soybean fields during the growing season is indispensable for optimizing yields and forecasting sustainable agricultural practices. Leveraging advancements in remote sensing technology, passive microwave soil moisture retrieval has emerged as a crucial tool for large-scale precision agriculture and enduring environmental monitoring. However, challenges in the L-band Microwave Emission of the Biosphere (L-MEB) model, particularly in the computation of vegetation transmissivity, may compromise the accuracy of soil moisture retrieval. In this study, we improved the Beer-Lambert law to more accurately quantify the attenuation effect of the vegetation layer on microwave signals, aiming to ameliorate the inherent limitations in the L-MEB model. The proposed soil moisture retrieval method, primarily validated in soybean fields, was also subjected to supplementary experiments in canola and wheat fields to further assess its effectiveness and generalizability. The proposed method integrates passive microwave and optical data, demonstrating a substantial improvement in accuracy. Experimental results reveal that our enhanced method significantly outperforms the L-MEB model in soybean fields: Pearson correlation coefficients of soil moisture, derived using vegetation water content and leaf area index, are 0.712 and 0.692 respectively. Furthermore, root mean square errors have decreased to 0.056m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup>/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> and 0.050 m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup>/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup>, a reduction of 39.78% and 19.35%, respectively. In canola and wheat fields, the method exhibited an approximate 10% enhancement in retrieval accuracy. This advancement not only furnishes novel technical support for water management in soybean cultivation but also contributes theoretical and technical insights to the domain of passive microwave soil moisture retrieval. Index Terms-L-MEB model, passive microwave, soil moisture retrieval, vegetation transmissivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207