MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409884757 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.155151

Entropic <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> function of three-dimensional Ising conformal field theory via fuzzy sphere regularization

2025· article· en· W4409884757 on OpenAlexafffund
Liangdong Hu, Wei Zhu, Yin-Chen He

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum many-body systems
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIsing modelConformal mapMathematicsRegularization (linguistics)Function (biology)PhysicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisArtificial intelligenceStatistical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The $F$ function, the three-dimensional counterpart of the central charge in the two-dimensional (2D) conformal field theory, measures the effective number of degrees of freedom in three-dimensional (3D) quantum field theory, and it is monotonically decreasing under the renormalization group flow. However, unlike the 2D central charge, the $F$ function is a nonlocal quantity and cannot be computed using correlators of local operators. Utilizing the recently proposed fuzzy sphere regularization, we have performed the first nonperturbative computation of the $F$ function for the paradigmatic 3D Ising conformal field theory through entanglement entropy. Our computation yields ${F}_{\text{Ising}}=0.0612(5)$, slightly smaller than the $F$ function of a real free scalar, ${F}_{\text{free}}=\frac{log2}{8}\ensuremath{-}\frac{3\ensuremath{\zeta}(3)}{16{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{2}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.0638$, consistent with the $F$ theorem, and close to the $4\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ expansion estimates of ${F}_{\text{Ising}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.061\ensuremath{\sim}0.062$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicQuantum many-body systemsFrench-language works237,207