La fine della democratizzazione delle relazioni internazionali: la Società delle Nazioni nella crisi etiopica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The League of Nations is often described as inadequate to the objectives for which it was founded due to its failure in the Ethiopian crisis. The Abyssinian imbroglio, how- ever, led to the small and medium powers’ strong commitment to applying the League’s principles, with an immense faith in the possibility of preventing aggression from be- coming a method to resolve international disputes. Those principles and commitment also inspired the imposition of the League’s sanctions for the first time. Nevertheless, for many countries this was just an illusion: through the crisis both Great Britain and France only defended their imperial interests, subordinating to them the League’s val- ues embodied by the Covenant. That reality became visible with the Hoare-Laval plan, that suddenly closed all hopes, and in the following months the organization saw the progressive departure of all members until its final collapse. Therefore, the League of Nations fell victim of great powers during the Ethiopian crisis, and it was them who put an end to the first attempt to democratize international relations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".