MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PICRUSt2-SC: an update to the reference database used for functional prediction within PICRUSt2

2025· article· en· W4409886452 on OpenAlexafffund
Robyn Wright, Morgan G. I. Langille

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsDatabaseComputer scienceSource codeCode (set theory)Process (computing)GenomeInformation retrievalSet (abstract data type)Programming languageBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY: PICRUSt2 is a bioinformatic tool that predicts microbial functions in amplicon sequencing data using a database of annotated reference genomes. We have constructed an updated database for PICRUSt2 that has substantially increased the number of bacterial (19,493 to 26,868) and archaeal (406 to 1,002) genomes as well as the number of functional annotations present. The previous PICRUSt2 database relied on many timely and computationally intensive manual processes that made it difficult to update. We constructed a new streamlined process to allow regular upgrades to the PICRUSt2 database on an ongoing basis, and used this process to create a new database, PICRUSt2-SC (Sugar-Coated). Additionally, we have shown that this updated database contains genomes that more closely match study sequences from a range of different environments. The genomes contained in the database therefore better represent these environments and this leads to an improvement in the predicted functional annotations obtained from PICRUSt2. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PICRUSt2 source code is freely available at https://github.com/picrust/picrust2 and at https://anaconda.org/bioconda/picrust2. The latest version of PICRUSt2 at the time of writing is also archived: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15119781. The PICRUSt2-SC database comes pre-installed with PICRUSt2 from version 2.6.0 onwards. Step-by-step instructions for making the updated database are at https://github.com/picrust/picrust2/wiki/Updating-the-PICRUSt2-database. All code used for the analyses and figures in this manuscript is at https://github.com/R-Wright-1/PICRUSt2-SC_application_note and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15119770.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioinformaticsSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207