Vital Sign and Biochemical Data Collection Using Non-contact Photoplethysmography and the Comestai Mobile Health App: Protocol for an Observational Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early detection of vital sign changes is key to recognizing patient deterioration promptly, enabling timely interventions and potentially preventing adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: In this study, vital parameters (heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and blood pressure) will be measured using the Comestai app to confirm the accuracy of photoplethysmography methods compared to standard clinical practice devices, analyzing a large and diverse population. In addition, the app will facilitate big data collection to enhance the algorithm's performance in measuring hemoglobin, glycated hemoglobin, and total cholesterol. METHODS: A total of 3000 participants will be consecutively enrolled to achieve the objectives of this study. In all patients, personal data, medical condition, and treatment overview will be recorded. The "by face" method for remote photoplethysmography vital sign data collection involves recording participants' faces using the front camera of a mobile device (iOS or Android) for approximately 1.5 minutes. Simultaneously, vital signs will be continuously collected for about 1.5 minutes using the reference devices alongside data collected via the Comestai app; biochemical results will also be recorded. The accuracy of the app measurements compared to the reference devices and standard tests will be assessed for all parameters. CIs will be calculated using the bootstrap method. The proposed approach's effectiveness will be evaluated using various quality criteria, including the mean error, SD, mean absolute error, root mean square error, and mean absolute percentage error. The correlation between measurements obtained using the app and reference devices and standard tests will be evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Agreement between pairs of measurements (app vs reference devices and standard tests) will be represented using Bland-Altman plots. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and likelihood ratios will be calculated to determine the ability of the new app to accurately measure vital signs. RESULTS: Data collection began in June 2024. As of March 25, 2025, we have recruited 1200 participants. The outcomes of the study are expected at the end of 2025. The analysis plan involves verifying and validating the parameters collected from mobile devices via the app, reference devices, and prescheduled blood tests, along with patient demographic data. CONCLUSIONS: Our study will enhance and support the accuracy of data on vital sign detection through PPG, also introducing measurements of biochemical risk indicators. The evaluation of a large population will allow for continuous improvement in the performance and accuracy of artificial intelligence algorithms, reducing errors. Expanding research on mobile health solutions like Comestai can support preventive care by validating their effectiveness as screening tools and guiding future health care technology developments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06427564; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06427564.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".