MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409893300 · doi:10.71352/ac.44.153

On the n-th element of a set of positive integers

2015· article· en· W4409893300 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean–Marie De Koninck, Vincent Ouellet

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae Sectio computatorica · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimization and Packing Problems
Canadian institutionsNanoQuébec (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElement (criminal law)Set (abstract data type)MathematicsCombinatoricsComputer sciencePolitical scienceProgramming languageLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a set A of positive integers and its counting function A(x) := #{n ≤ x : n ∈ A}, we examine the size of the n-th element of A using the size of A(x).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae Sectio computatoricaSame topicOptimization and Packing ProblemsFrench-language works237,207