MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409893542 · doi:10.1080/13698230.2025.2489242

Refuge, resettlement, open borders, and voluntary immobility: <i>The Ethics of Immigration</i> in a time of climate change

2025· article· en· W4409893542 on OpenAlex
Courtney Jung

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change, Adaptation, Migration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationClimate changeSociologyPolitical scienceLawCriminologyPolitical economyEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this essay I extend Joseph Carens’s arguments in The Ethics of Immigration to fit a world in which migration happens on a greater scale, and for different reasons, than he envisioned. Some subset of those most heavily impacted by climate-driven environmental disasters will become climate refugees. They will be owed non-refoulement and, following Carens, permanent resettlement with an opportunity to establish membership in a new state. For those who are climate migrants, the ethical response is open borders. These ethical responses to people on the move, however, must be bolstered by funding for mitigation and adaptation that make it possible for people to choose voluntary immobility – a right to stay home.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it