Robust phylogenetic profile clustering for <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> proteins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Genes are continually formed and lost as a genome evolves. However, new genes may tend to appear during specific evolutionary epochs rather than others, or disappear together in a more recent organismal clade. Methods to identify gene origination might simply use the last common ancestor to contain an ortholog as the putative gene origination point, or use a heuristic threshold that allows for a certain amount of missing orthologs in the cohort of species examined. Here, to avoid such issues, an alternative approach based on the clustering of phylogenetic profiles is applied, and the results are examined for any evidence of epochal trends in gene origination, and associated trends in specific sequence traits or functional associations. Methods A phylogenetic profile is simply an array indicating the presence or absence of a gene in a list of species. These profiles were compared and clustered to discern patterns in gene occurrences across >800 fungal species, centering the analysis on the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Results Clear epochs of gene origination were observed linked to the last common ancestors of Saccharomycetaceae and Saccharomycetes , and also to Fungi and earlier ancestors. These trends are independent of the proteome and genome-assembly quality of the underlying data. Clusters of phylogenetic profiles demonstrated some significant functional associations, such as to cellular spore formation and chromosome segregation in genes originating in Saccharomycetaceae . The phylogenetic profile clustering analysis enabled detection of parameter-independent trends in intrinsic disorder, prion-like composition and gene uniqueness as a function of epochal gene age. For example: new proteins with prion-like domains have arisen at a similar rate for most of fungal evolution centred on S. cerevisiae ; the most proteins with mild intrinsic disorder have appeared during the early Saccharomycetaceae epoch rather than more recently, and very recently formed genes are the least likely to be single-copy ( i.e ., ‘unique’ yeast proteins). Conclusions For individual proteins, the profile cluster data generated here are useful for investigating experimental hypotheses, since they provide evidence for functional linkages that have yet to be discerned.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".