MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409902699 · doi:10.37867/te160418

GREEN REVOLUTION AND ITS IMPACTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT: A REVIEW

2024· review· en· W4409902699 on OpenAlex
Lavera Atieno Ochieng, Rohan Thakker, Hitesh Solanki

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTowards Excellence · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreen RevolutionHistoryArchaeologyAgriculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Green Revolution, a set of agricultural improvements implemented in the mid-twentieth century, significantly improved food production and relieved hunger for millions worldwide. This review study investigates the Green Revolution's diverse environmental implications. Without a doubt, introducing high-yield crops, irrigation systems, and synthetic fertilizers, has increased agricultural production and raised environmental issues. These include soil deterioration, water shortages, biodiversity loss, and increasing greenhouse gas emissions. This research investigates the difficult balance between the benefits of increased food security and the environmental costs, emphasizing the importance of sustainable agriculture techniques to prevent negative consequences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it