MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409902815 · doi:10.18280/jesa.580315

Advanced Deep Learning Models for Accurate Solar Energy Output Prediction

2025· article· en· W4409902815 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
May Abdulsamad Sadeq, Mustafa Ali Abdulhadi, H Talib

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep learningSolar energyEnergy (signal processing)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMathematicsStatisticsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solar energy plays a pivotal role in achieving international sustainability goals, making accurate prediction of sun electricity output a critical location of research.This study focuses on developing and evaluating advanced deep learning models, consisting of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and Transformers, for predicting solar power production.High-decision meteorological datasets, encompassing sun irradiance, temperature, wind pace, and humidity, have been collected from NASA, NREL, and neighborhood databases.Rigorous preprocessing techniques, such as normalization, imputation, and characteristic engineering, were implemented to ensure information exceptional.The fashions have been evaluated the use of metrics which include RMSE, MAE, and R , with the Transformer version attaining the best overall performance due to its ability to capture long-term dependencies and complicated characteristic interactions.Results tested widespread development over traditional models, underscoring the capability of deep studying in solar forecasting.While demanding situations related to computational complexity and records availability had been identified, the have a look at shows integrating extra records resources and optimizing architectures for broader utility.The findings hold extensive practical price, helping efficient electricity storage control, grid optimization, and renewable strength policy making plans.This work contributes a strong framework for enhancing solar electricity prediction, paving the way for innovative solutions in renewable power structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207