A Case Report of Mega Cisterna Magna with Extra-cranial Features of Dandy-Walker Malformation in an Adult: Implications for the Dandy-Walker Complex Continuum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Posterior fossa malformations are rare cyst-like pathologies of the central nervous system. Outcomes of patients with these conditions are largely documented in fetal or early childhood studies as most cases are non-compatible with life. Also, different schemes to categorize these occurrences have been proposed. One classification puts forth that the entities are a continuum of pathologies, called the Dandy Walker Complex, wherein Mega Cisterna Magna is the most benign to Dandy Walker Malformation as the most severe form. We report the first case of a patient with a mixed presentation of Mega Cisterna Magna having extracranial manifestations of Dandy Walker Malformation reaching her adult years. The patient is a 26-year-old female who was apparently well until she presented with recurrent headache and seizure episodes of 2-year duration. She had an unremarkable birth and childhood history, apart from learning difficulties in school. In her adult years, she gave birth to an infant with multiple physical anomalies. She has a maternal uncle with abnormal facie and intellectual disability. Physical examination of the patient exhibited a bulging occiput, hypertelorism, down-slanting palpebral fissures, large globular nose, large ear lobules, high arched palate, and clinodactyly. Neurologic examination was unremarkable. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed Mega Cisterna Magna and was deemed non-surgical. She remained seizure-free during admission as well as on follow-up, maintained on Phenytoin. The existence of a Dandy-Walker continuum is still debated, as the link among the disease entities are yet to be established using developmental or genetic studies. This case, however, supports the Dandy-Walker Complex classification by demonstrating a rare combination of Mega Cisterna Magna with features of Dandy-Walker Malformation in an adult. This can contribute to disease definition and eventually to the discovery of the pathobiological mechanisms of posterior fossa cysts, and to appropriate diagnosis and management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".