Discovering governing equations of biological systems through representation learning and sparse model discovery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the governing rules of complex biological systems remains a significant challenge due to the nonlinear, high-dimensional nature of biological data. In this study, we present CLERA, a novel end-to-end computational framework designed to uncover parsimonious dynamical models and identify active gene programs from single-cell RNA sequencing data. By integrating a supervised autoencoder architecture with Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics, CLERA leverages prior knowledge to simultaneously extract related low-dimensional representation and uncover the underlying dynamical systems that drive the processes. Through the analysis of both synthetic and biological data, CLERA demonstrates robust performance in reconstructing gene expression dynamics, identifying key regulatory genes, and capturing temporal patterns across distinct cell types. CLERA's ability to generate dynamic interaction networks, combined with network rewiring using Personalized PageRank to highlight central genes and active gene programs, offers new insights into the complex regulatory mechanisms underlying cellular processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it