Mitochondrial membrane hyperpolarization modulates nuclear DNA methylation and gene expression through phospholipid remodeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maintenance of the mitochondrial inner membrane potential (ΔΨm) is critical for many aspects of mitochondrial function. While ΔΨm loss and its consequences are well studied, little is known about the effects of mitochondrial hyperpolarization. In this study, we used cells deleted of ATP5IF1 (IF1), a natural inhibitor of the hydrolytic activity of the ATP synthase, as a genetic model of increased resting ΔΨm. We found that the nuclear DNA hypermethylates when the ΔΨm is chronically high, regulating the transcription of mitochondrial, carbohydrate and lipid genes. These effects can be reversed by decreasing the ΔΨm and recapitulated in wild-type (WT) cells exposed to environmental chemicals that cause hyperpolarization. Surprisingly, phospholipid changes, but not redox or metabolic alterations, linked the ΔΨm to the epigenome. Sorted hyperpolarized WT and ovarian cancer cells naturally depleted of IF1 also showed phospholipid remodeling, indicating this as an adaptation to mitochondrial hyperpolarization. These data provide a new framework for how mitochondria can impact epigenetics and cellular biology to influence health outcomes, including through chemical exposures and in disease states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".