MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409908879 · doi:10.1097/cce.0000000000001257

Early Pupil Abnormality Frequency Predicts Poor Outcomes and Enhances International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) Model Prognostication in Traumatic Brain Injury

2025· article· en· W4409908879 on OpenAlexaff
Divya Veerapaneni, Naveen Arunachalam Sakthiyendran, Yili Du, Leigh Ann Mallinger, Andrew Reinert, So Yeon Kim, Chuong Nguyen, Ali Daneshmand, Mohamad Abdalkader, Shariq Mohammed, Josée Dupuis, Kevin N. Sheth, Emily J. Gilmore, David M. Greer, Charlene Ong

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Explorations · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
KeywordsPupillometryTraumatic brain injuryPupilMedicineLogistic regressionObservational studyAbnormalityInternal medicinePsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IMPORTANCE: In patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), baseline pupillary assessment is routine; however, the occurrence rate and clinical significance of pupil abnormalities over the early course of hospitalization remain poorly characterized. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the occurrence and frequency of pupil abnormalities within the first 72 hours of ICU admission are associated with unfavorable discharge outcomes and to assess whether incorporating this frequency improves the performance of an established prognostic model. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective observational study of adults admitted with a primary diagnosis of TBI to a single tertiary care ICU between 2018 and 2022. Inclusion criteria included at least three quantitative pupillometry assessments within the first 72 hours. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Quantitative pupillometry was used to calculate the Neurological Pupil index (NPi) at each assessment. Abnormalities were defined as NPi less than 3 in either eye, NPi asymmetry greater than or equal to 0.7, or pupil size asymmetry greater than or equal to 1 mm. The primary outcome was unfavorable discharge disposition (death, hospice, or long-term care). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between pupil abnormality frequency and outcomes, and model performance was compared using goodness-of-fit tests with and without pupil frequency added to the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (IMPACT) model. RESULTS: Among 131 patients (median age, 59 yr; 30% women), 35% had an unfavorable discharge disposition. Pupil abnormalities occurred in 60% of mild, 61% of moderate, and 88% of severe TBI patients. For each 1% increase in the frequency of pupil abnormalities over 72 hours, the odds of unfavorable discharge increased by 3% (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05). Adding pupil abnormality frequency to the IMPACT model improved its goodness-of-fit (χ2 = 5.24; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Pupil abnormalities are common across TBI severities, particularly in severe cases. A higher frequency of abnormal pupil measurements within the first 72 hours is associated with unfavorable outcomes and significantly enhances the predictive performance of established TBI prognostic models. Serial quantitative pupillometry may offer clinically valuable, dynamic prognostic information in the acute care setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care ExplorationsSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesFrench-language works237,207