MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409910393 · doi:10.62517/jbdc.202401418

Task Migration Strategy in Vehicular Networks Based on Reinforcement Learning

2024· article· en· W4409910393 on OpenAlexaff
Jing Zou, Gong Qishuai, Zhe Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of big data and computing. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningTask (project management)Computer scienceReinforcementCognitive psychologyArtificial intelligencePsychologyEngineeringSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the research and application of edge computing in vehicular networks, computing tasks can be offloaded from vehicles to roadside edge servers to reduce system service latency. However, as vehicles move, the computing tasks need to be migrated from one edge server to another. Predicting the vehicles movement trajectory and formulating a reasonable task migration plan for this is a key challenge that needs to be addressed. Traditional computing offloading methods cannot be directly applied in vehicular networks. Therefore, this paper constructs a vehicular task offloading system based on a multi-layered computing network, introduces a Markov mobility model to describe the vehicle movement trajectory, and solves the optimal migration path problem. Since this problem is NP-hard, a solution method based on a constrained Markov model is proposed, along with an Actor-Network Primal-Dual Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (ANPD-DDPG) algorithm based on reinforcement learning to achieve the optimal solution. Finally, in simulation experiments, the proposed method is compared with existing research, showing about a 33% reduction in system delay and migration cost. The characteristics of the ANPD-DDPG algorithm in terms of convergence speed and system delay are also analyze.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of big data and computing.Same topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207