Anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy in an extremely premature un-intubated micropremie - A case report -
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extremely premature neonates can have neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthetic challenges can result, especially during rigid bronchoscopy requiring maintenance of spontaneous ventilation. CASE: 1-day old 560 g female, 23-weeks and 6 days gestation was born with labored breathing and intubated at birth. Four attempts, including one with video-laryngoscopy and visualization of the endotracheal tube going through the vocal cords failed to detect end tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2). She was extubated onto bilevel positive pressure and transferred for urgent rigid bronchoscopy under anesthesia to rule out tracheoesophageal fistula. Intraoperatively, lack of EtCO2 for over 1 min after 2.5 mm ETT placement over a rigid bronchoscope was noted and overcome using sustained high peak inspiratory pressures. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of preoperative surfactant administration in extremely premature neonates may lead to significant atelectasis with inability to detect EtCO2 after intubation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".