MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409910993 · doi:10.2196/69298

Designing a Finite Element Model to Determine the Different Fixation Positions of Tracheal Catheters in the Oral Cavity for Minimizing the Risk of Oral Mucosal Pressure Injury: Comparison Study

2025· article· en· W4409910993 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yatian Zhang, Xian Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNosocomial Infections in ICU
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintTube (container)Finite element methodPosition (finance)Endotracheal tubeOral cavityEngineeringMedicineComputer scienceDentistryMechanical engineeringStructural engineeringSurgeryWorld Wide WebIntubationBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Despite being an important life-saving medical device to ensure smooth breathing in critically ill patients, the tracheal tube causes damage to the oral mucosa of patients during use, which increases not only the pain but also the risk of infection. Objective: This study aimed to establish finite element models for different fixation positions of tracheal catheters in the oral cavity to identify the optimal fixation position that minimizes the risk of oral mucosal pressure injury. Methods: Computed tomography data of the head and face from healthy male subjects were selected, and a 3D finite element model was created using Mimics 21 and Geomagic Wrap 2021 software. A pressure sensor was used to measure the actual pressure exerted by the oral soft tissue on the upper and lower lips, as well as the left and right mouth corners of the tracheal catheter. The generated model was imported into Ansys Workbench 22.0 software, where all materials were assigned appropriate values, and boundary conditions were established. Vertical loads of 2.6 N and 3.43 N were applied to the upper and lower lips, while horizontal loads of 1.76 N and 1.82 N were applied to the left and right corners of the mouth, respectively, to observe the stress distribution characteristics of the skin, mucosa, and muscle tissue in four fixation areas. Results: The mean (SD) equivalent stress and shear stress of the skin and mucosal tissues were the lowest in the left mouth corner (28.42 [0.65] kPa and 6.58 [0.16] kPa, respectively) and progressively increased in the right mouth corner (30.72 [0.98] kPa and 7.05 [0.32] kPa, respectively), upper lip (35.20 [0.99] kPa and 7.70 [0.17] kPa, respectively), and lower lip (41.79 [0.48] kPa and 10.02 [0.44] kPa, respectively; P<.001 for both stresses). The equivalent stress and shear stress of the muscle tissue were the lowest in the right mouth angle (34.35 [0.52] kPa and 5.69 [0.29] kPa, respectively) and progressively increased in the left mouth corner (35.64 [1.18] kPa and 5.74 [0.30] kPa, respectively), upper lip (43.17 [0.58] kPa and 8.91 [0.55] kPa, respectively), and lower lip (43.17 [0.58] kPa and 11.96 [0.50] kPa, respectively; P<.001 for both stresses). The equivalent stress and shear stress of muscle tissues were significantly greater than those of skin and mucosal tissues in the four fixed positions, and the difference was statistically significant (P<.05). Conclusions: Fixation of the tracheal catheter at the left and right oral corners results in the lowest equivalent and shear stresses, while the lower lip exhibited the highest stresses. We recommend minimizing the contact time and area of the lower lip during tracheal catheter fixation, and to alternately replace the contact area at the left and right oral corners to prevent oral mucosal pressure injuries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Bioinformatics and BiotechnologySame topicNosocomial Infections in ICUFrench-language works237,207